Letter to Governor Christie
have written to you and Paula T. Dow on numerous occasions in the
past year for help with what I perceive as a flagrantly corrupt
Judge in Burlington County Superior Court, Judge M. J. Hogan.
To date you and the Attorney General have done nothing to
investigate and put an end to the abuse being handed down by
Judge Hogan. Abuse that is causing a third party my 82 year
old handicapped Mother physical, mental, emotional and financial
harm! Are Judges in New Jersey not bound by the Code
of Judicial Conduct?
Does anyone enforce the Code of Judicial Conduct? Do we
have a right to a fair trial? A jury? A right to an
impartial Judge? A right to know what statutes gives
of the attorneys turn a blind eye as if everything is as it
should be when the fact is that there is not one instance where
Judge Hogan has ruled according to the law and the rules of
court. In a year not one of the multiple attorneys have
done what they were retained to do but they do take my Mothers
money to go along with Judge Hogan!
Father was a Honorably Discharged Veteran of WWII. He
risked his life for this Country and you are allowing his wife,
my Mother, to be abused by what I perceive as a flagrantly
corrupt Judge and the attorneys who not only allow him to do as
he pleases, they claim that he has done no wrong.
are two of numerous letters sent to you and Paula Dow. They
were printed from these files:
30, 2011 - April
also carbon copied numerous court filing to both you and Paula
Dow. It didn't stop Judge Hogan from ignoring the law, the
rules of court and a persons Civil and Constitutional Rights.
Some examples of documents copied to you and Paula Dow:
18, 2011 - May
16, 2011 - May
answer to the motion for leave of court to file an amended
complaint. Clearly Judge Hogan has no regard for the law as
he granted the motion in spite of the fact that Mr. Barbour did
not include a required copy of the amended complaint, the fact
that I proved approximately 90 outright lies in the sworn
affidavits included with the motion papers and the fact that the
motion did not contain proof or even evidence of any of the
claims. My answer also, yet again, quoted statutes showing
that the plaintiff had no standing whatsoever! Judge Hogan
ruled in favor of an amended complaint that he never laid his
Hogan's rulings were even more corrupt after he was informed that
I had contacted you and the Attorney General.
Is it that Judge Hogan and the attorneys have absolutely
no respect for you? No
fear of you? Is it because you gave them a green light to
use the court to abuse us and an 82 year old handicapped woman
who is not a party to the suit? Something else? Are
you going to continue to let them all ignore the law and our
Constitutional and Civil Rights?
date this case has been ongoing for a year in spite of the fact
that the plaintiff has no and never has had any standing
whatsoever as he filed on behalf of a third party who is
mentally capable and not a party to the suit.
time I have been before Judge Hogan the court room is empty.
Usually we are the last case to be heard. Why? Just a
coincidence? No statute has been quoted in the complaint
and no less than 20 requests to quote a statute showing that the
plaintiff has standing have been ignored. It's been a year
and I don't have a clue what Statutes Judge Hogan is ruling on.
Mother, the third party, has also submitted a sworn affidavit
1 - Page
2) that the claims made
by the plaintiff are false yet her sworn affidavit is ignored and
the case continues. The plaintiff is acting on behalf of my
Mother who is not a party to the case. Thousands of dollars
of my mothers limited assets have been taken by attorneys after
her sworn affidavit was ignored. That's the way it works in
it make sense to you that the plaintiff is being heard on behalf
of my Mother in spite of the fact that my Mother submitted a
sworn affidavit that his claims are not truthful?
few of numerous examples of the flagrant
corruption, disregard for the law and rules of court in this case
Hogan adjourned an un-contested motion to dismiss that surely
should have been granted as it was based on fact and the law.
Judge Hogan then ignored the Motion to Dismiss as he never ruled
on the uncontested Motion. I was represented by Thomas
Begley 3 from Begley Law Group in Moorestown, NJ. Read the
documentation, correspondence, audio files and emails and tell me
that Mr. Begley gave proper representation and complied with the
Hogan then held a hearing in an empty court room without the jury
that was demanded and that we were entitled too under the law.
Judge Hogan found in favor of the plaintiff in spite of the fact
that the plaintiff did not have one shred of proof or even
evidence of any of his claims. In spite of the fact that we
proved numerous outright lies including the fact that the
plaintiff claimed to be a Co-Trustee when he knew and it was
proven that he was never a Co-Trustee. In spite of the fact
that the plaintiff had and still has no standing to act on behalf
of a third party. A third party who submitted a sworn
affidavit that the plaintiffs claims are not truthful.
third party, my Mother, at different times, hired two attorneys
Mr. David Cuneo and Mr. Del Sorto. My Mother told both to
evict the plaintiff and a squatter from her home so that she
could return to her home. The first eviction request to Mr.
Del Sorto was made in February. To date my Mother is still
not in her home as neither Mr. Del Sorto nor Mr. Cuneo proceeded
with an eviction. Mr. Cuneo heard himself telling my Mother
that he would evict in a recording, he was sent a hand written
letter by my Mother to evict, numerous emails to evict and never
even attempted to evict. Mr. Cuneo did send numerous
letters and emails claiming that my Mother did not say to evict
in spite of hearing himself say that he would evict. All of
the documentation will be provided. Is it obvious to you
that someone is telling the attorneys to not evict? Would that be
collusion? Conspiracy? Both took Moms money, neither
proceeded with the evictions. My Mother will not spend
any more of her limited assets to evict as it is apparent that
someone is telling the attorneys to not evict. Read the
correspondence, emails and listen to the audio files pertaining
to Mr. Cuneo. Could it be more clear that someone is
stopping him from doing what he was told and being paid to do?
would assume that you are aware that guardians are appointed for
mentally incapacitated adults. Judge Hogan appointed a
guardian ad litem for my Mother in spite of the fact that no
one filed a petition as required by R
4:86. Nothing that
is required by R
4:86 was done to appoint
the guardian ad litem. Counsel was not appointed to
represent my alleged mentally incapacitated Mother, only a
guardian ad litem. Judge Hogan ordered the guardian ad
litem in spite of the fact that my Mother, a third party had
passed the second of two mental exams two days prior to Judge
Hogan appointing the guardian. The guardian was appointed
in the order to a motion for leave of court to file an amended
complaint that made no claims about my Mothers mental status.
I can not imagine that anyone, let alone an 82 year old
handicapped woman, would not be stressed out if they were put in
such a position. To have their right to make their own
decisions taken away from them. How would you feel if a
Judge totally ignored the required legal process and found that
you needed a guardian? Is that the way it works in NJ?
A Judge can mentally abuse an 82 year old physically handicapped
wife of a deceased Veteran of WWII? A Judge can with the
swipe of a pen make a mentally competent person mentally
incapacitated? A judge can ignore the required legal
process, abuse and harm an 82 year old woman who is not a party
to the case? In a case where the plaintiff has no standing
whatsoever? A Judge who signs an order implying that he
will decide where and with whom my Mother shall live?
Hogan ruled in favor of the amended complaint without ever seeing
the amended complaint. The amended complaint is required by
the rules of court to be submitted with the motion but was not.
The amended complaint was not submitted at the hearing. It
took me over two months to get a copy of the amended complaint as
numerous certified letters to Judge Hogan and all of the parties
ignored my request for a copy. Is that the way it works in
New Jersey? A party to a case can not get a copy of a
complaint that must be answered? I'm supposed to defend
myself without a copy of the complaint? Is it OK with you
that a citizen of New Jersey can be treated in such a manner by a
Superior Court Judge? Is it ok that the attorneys go along
with such conduct while defrauding my Mother out of her limited
Judge rules in Court and tells the plaintiffs attorney Roger
Barbour of Barbour & Barbour in Maple Shade, NJ to submit the
order. Mr. Barbour submits an order contrary to what was
ordered. Mr. Barbour submits an order that reflects what he
wants ordered, not what was ordered in court and Judge Hogan
signs the order. The rules of court specify that a court
order reflect and memorialize what was actually ordered not what
a party wants the order to say after the hearing. Is this
ok with you? Is New Jersey part of the United States where
people are supposed to be protected by the law? Do you know
of any other Judges in the State that let attorneys overrule
their in court orders without a hearing?
Hogan then thru a second party (Mr. Barbour) sent Adult
Protective Services to speak to my Mother. Adult Protective
Services found no wrongdoing, no kidnapping, no hostage holding,
no abuse and that my Mother was well cared for. Just like
every example or fact favoring the defendants it is ignored by
only people abusing my Mother are Judge Hogan and the attorneys
who turn a blind eye to all of the wrongdoing. The only
people stealing from my Mother are the attorneys who take
retainers from her, do not do what they are retained to do and
ignore their ethical duty to provide proper representation!
The attorneys who dip into their retainers while allowing Judge
Hogan to do as he pleases no matter how flagrantly he ignores the
law and the rules of court. The attorneys who ignore the
obvious violations of a persons Civil Rights, Constitutional
Rights and the law to play along in a text book example of a
early April Judge Hogan ordered that the guardian ad litem Ms.
Deborah J. Merriam of Moorestown, NJ be appointed. As I
previously stated Judge Hogan did not appoint Counsel to
represent my Mother, only Ms. Merriam.
did not reflect what was ordered in court. Ms. Merriam did
not attempt to speak with my Mother until May 17, 2011, one day
before she was to submit her report and one day prior to another
case management conference. My Mother was tortured and
tormented, living in fear while Ms. Merriam drug her heels to see
my Mother. Actually it was Ms. Vidal, the attorney for my
Mothers Trustee who showed up on May 17, 2011 to see my Mother.
Vidal was going to do Merriam's job for her since she was in
town. Sound right to you? That counsel for a
defendant shows up to do the duty of a guardian ad litem?
I'm sure I can get the security video from the 17th showing Ms.
Vidal in the lobby waiting for my Mother to return. If you
downloaded the files
can hear Ms. Merriam's message confirming that Ms. Vidal was
at the May 18 case management conference Judge Hogan ordered that
Ms. Merriam the illegally appointed guardian ad litem was to
speak to my Mother to find if she was taken against her will and
being held hostage. (kidnapped) In civil court?
Really? Kidnapping issues get decided in civil court?
After sending Adult Protective Services for the same reason and
knowing that there was no wrongdoing? Knowing that my Mother was
not kidnapped and being held hostage? Months after the
supposed kidnapping? Months after my Mother was in court
with me in January? The kidnapping claim was made in early
January. Within two weeks of the claim of kidnapping my
Mother was in Court with me and months later Judge Hogan orders
in court that the guardian is to visit with my Mother to find if
she was kidnapped and being held hostage? It was claimed in
January that I took my Mother against her will and in May Judge
Hogan orders an illegally appointed guardian to find out if my
Mother was kidnapped? In spite of the fact that the
plaintiffs own exhibits had already shown that my Mother came of
her own free will? Holding her hostage when in fact two
Attorneys took my Mothers money to evict and never attempted to
evict freeloaders and squatters from her home so she could go
home. The first took her money in February. Neither
proceeded with the evictions but a claim of hostage holding is
made against me in May? Mom would be home if either Mr. Del
Sorto or Mr. Cuneo evicted as they were told to do but instead I
am accused of holding my Mother hostage. As a matter of
fact, Mr. Cuneo was representing my Mother at the time I was
accused of holding her hostage. In spite of the fact that
the conversation with Mr. Cuneo about the evictions was recorded,
Mr. Cuneo repeatedly refused to admit that my Mother told him to
evict. I was being accused of holding my Mother Hostage
while my Mothers attorney continually lied that she said they
could stay. ONLY IN NEW JERSEY!
not reflect what was ordered in court. A guardian gives an
opinion where and with whom my Mother should live? Really?
Do you think that would upset any Senior Citizen? That she
may be told where and with whom she will live? As if she
does not have the freedom to decide for herself where and with
whom she shall live? Is
it even possible in the USA?
Judge who ignored two mental exams given by two different Doctors
at two different respected Medical facilities wants an illegally
appointed guardian ad litem to do her own version of a mental
exam? Judge Hogan appoints a guardian while in possession
of two mental exams taken by my Mother within a year? Is
that the way it works in New Jersey? Ignore mental exams
given by respected Doctors from respected Medical Facilities and
order a non-qualified, non-authorized illegally appointed
guardian who accepts the guardianship knowing that she was not
appointed according to the law, who knows what she is allowed to
do and knowingly and willfully does what she knows she is not
allowed to do, perform her own version of a mental exam?
is not a guardians duty to give their own version of a mental
exam or to give an opinion of a persons mental status.
Guardians are appointed for those who are
incapacitated not those who easily passed a mental exam two days
prior to the appointing of the guardian. How can a Judge
just ignore two mental exams and the required legal process to
appoint a guardian ad litem? It's ok with you? Is it
a violation of a persons Civil and Constitutional Rights?
Judge Hogan took the word of the plaintiffs lawyer that my Mother
was suffering from advanced dementia in spite of the fact that I
had proven approximately 90 lies in the plaintiffs motion.
Most of the lies were proven in the plaintiffs own exhibits.
stress and anxiety caused by the illegal appointing of a guardian
caused my Mother, an 82 year old physically handicapped woman,
such stress and anxiety that she was continually vomiting to the
point that she called 911 numerous times. She sat up in
fear staring at the door each time someone knocked on the door.
She was prescribed two stress and anxiety medications as her
vomiting was caused by the stress and anxiety of Judge Hogan's
illegal ruling appointing the guardian. My Mother was and
is still living in fear due to Judge Hogan and the attorneys who
are acting in the best interests of the opposing party and a
Judge who ignores the law. Is it ok that a Judge do this to
an 82 year old handicapped woman or to anyone for that matter?
To completely ignore the law and the required legal process to
appoint a guardian for someone who is not mentally
incapacitated? Is it ok with you? Is this how seniors
are treated in New Jersey?
is clear and apparent that the guardian was appointed to gather
out of court testimony from the my Mother, the third party, to
help the plaintiff as the plaintiff has not submitted and does
not have any proof or even evidence of any of his claims.
The plaintiff has been proven to be a pathological liar in that
approximately 90 statements made in sworn affidavits submitted to
the court in his Motion For Leave Of Court To File An Amended
Complaint were proven as lies in My
Most of the plaintiffs lies were proven in the plaintiffs own
exhibits! The plaintiffs exhibits submitted with the motion
proved his own lies and the Judge still ruled in their favor.
When I finally received a copy of the amended complaint it
contained many of the same lies that were already proven as
lies. Make sense to you? To submit a complaint with
outright lies that have already been proven to be outright lies?
Mother hired and retained David K. Cuneo of Collingswood, NJ to
dispute the illegal appointing of the Guardian. Mr. Cuneo
was referred by my Mothers Doctors son. When Mr. Cuneo was
told the facts about what was happening in the case he would not
believe what was happening as he continually said, they can't do
that, are you sure, you must be mistaken. Mr. Cuneo wanted
proof of the claims as he did not believe what was happening.
Proof was provided. Mr. Cuneo was given a $5,000.00
retainer and then he "did that" right along with the
others. He went from "they can't do that" to
doing the same right along with the others. Mr.
Cuneo used up the entire $5,000.00 retainer without even
attempting to do as he was retained to do,
have the illegally appointed guardian removed. Mr. Cuneo
quit after using up the retainer. Is this ok with you?
it criminal fraud to take someone's money and not do what you are
hired to do?
you do anything about it or will you allow a NJ attorney to
defraud a senior citizen? There must be a reason why Mr.
Cuneo did not even attempt to do what he was retained to do.
Is it collusion? Conspiracy?
Merriam, the illegally appointed guardian ad litem, was informed
in certified mailings prior to meeting with my Mother that she
was illegally appointed as she was appointed with total disregard
of the law, process and rules of court. Ms. Merriam was
provided copies of court filings and copies of the two mental
exams showing that my Mother scored 30 out of 30 on the first and
29 out of 30 on the second mental exam. Ms. Merriam was
aware that my Mother had passed two mental exams within a year
with the most recent being taken two days prior to her being
appointed as the guardian. That didn't stop Ms. Merriam
from accepting the appointment without bond and doing as Mr.
Barbour ordered in his bogus order. Ms. Merriam willingly
and knowingly met with my Mother, did her own version of a mental
exam, questioned my Mother as if she was on the witness stand
trying to gather out of court testimony to help the plaintiff.
In the recording Ms. Merriam stated numerous times that she was
acting on Judge Hogan's instructions as she asked leading
questions, made statements that ended in "Right" and
did her best to lead my Mother to say what she wanted my Mother
to say. Ms. Merriam questioned my Mother on practically
every issue in the complaint. My Mother was also questioned
on numerous issues not in the complaint. Ms. Merriam was
doing her best to obtain anything that could be used against the
plaintiffs. This was all done in the presence of Kelli
Martone who was present to represent and protect my Mother.
Ms. Martone sat on her rump and allowed Ms. Merriam to do as she
pleased and did nothing to represent or protect my Mother.
My Mothers answers verified yet again that the plaintiff lied
about everything in the complaint. Ms. Merriam then
submitted a verifiably bogus report to the Court about a month
before Judge Hogan signed the order stating that she was to
submit a report. Verifiably bogus as the conversation was
recorded with my Mothers written consent. My Mother was
scared to death that she may be told where and with whom she
would live and wanted the conversation recorded to protect
herself. Clearly if the guardian was going to give an
honest opinion of where and with whom my Mother should live
instead of doing as Mr. Barbour ordered her to do in his bogus
order she would have asked my Mother if the plaintiff locked her
in her home. She would have asked if the plaintiff has my
Mothers house phone bugged. Audio/video cameras all over
the house. She would have asked if the plaintiff dealt
drugs from her home. The guardian ad litem would have asked
a lot of questions on issues I informed the court about.
The guardian ad litem asked none of those questions she only
asked questions that involved myself and the co-defendant.
When/if you hear the recording it will become quite clear that
Ms. Merriam was told by Judge Hogan to get information to use
against the defendants! The voicemail left by Ms. Merriam
is included in the files
provided on top of this page. Listen to Ms. Merriam's
message telling me what she is "Allowed" to do. She
knew what she was "allowed" to do and then came and did
everything that she knew she was not allowed to do and did it in
the presence of Kelli Martone who did nothing to protect or
represent my Mother.
Martone who works with Mr. Cuneo was present to represent my
Mother when Ms. Merriam spoke to my Mother. Kelli Martone
was aware that Judge Hogan ordered that Ms. Merriam was to find
if my Mother was kidnapped and being held hostage yet Ms. Martone
did nothing to represent my Mother as she allowed Ms. Merriam to
ask any and all questions, to question my Mother on issues in the
complaint and to do her own version of a mental exam. Ms.
Martone allowed Ms. Merriam to ask leading questions and make
statements ending with "Right." Ms. Martone
allowed Ms. Merriam to question my Mother about numerous issues
raised in the complaint. My Mother did remarkably well
being that she was on her two prescribed stress and anxiety
medications (alprazolam(generis Xanax) & hydroxyzine) when
questioned by Ms. Merriam. Merriam then submitted a
verifiably bogus report that says nothing about kidnapping or
hostage holding even though that is what was ordered in court.
Is this ok with you? Is it ok for illegally appointed
guardian ad litem's to knowingly do what they are not authorized,
qualified or even "Allowed" to do on a senior citizen
knowing that she was appointed as a guardian ad litem with total
disregard of the law and process? Does it sound as if there
is collusion going on?
Color Of Law
Conspiracy Against Rights
hours of receiving my email about the Federal criminal violations
all of the parties participated in an ex parte phone conference.
Mr. Cuneo, Ms. Merriam, Ms. Vidal, Mr. Barbour and Judge Hogan
all participated in the phone conference. I am a defendant
representing myself but I was not invited to participate in the
phone conference. There was no prior written notice.
I never received an order memorializing what was ordered if
anything in the phone conference. Is this the way it is in
NJ? This is allowed? It
is not a flagrant violation of our rights?
Mother has a trustee who also has power of attorney. The
Trustee (she) was named as a co-defendant in the order to the
Motion For Leave Of Court To File An Amended Complaint in spite
of the fact that nowhere in the motion did the plaintiff ask that
she be added as a defendant. No where in the motion did it
state why the plaintiff wanted to amend the complaint. She
was made a co-defendant in yet another order submitted by Mr.
Barbour. It's ok with you? Is that the way it works
in New Jersey?
my Mothers expense Ms. Renee Vidal of Flaster Greenberg in Cherry
Hill was retained to represent her Trustee the co-defendant.
Co-defendant? How can we be co-defendants when there are
different claims against each of us in the amended complaint?
In any event I have informed Ms. Vidal (Judge Hogan & all
parties) numerous times that the plaintiff has no standing
whatsoever as he has filed suit claiming wrongdoing against a
mentally competent third party, my Mother, who is not a party to
the suit. I have sent them all copies of my Mothers sworn
affidavit multiple times and my Mothers two mental exams
multiple times. Ms. Vidal has used up most of the $8,500.00
she has received without
ever raising the issue that the plaintiff has no standing.
It is the main issue that should be raised and would be raised if
we were not in a kangaroo court. Ms. Vidal did go along
with the guardian and everything the guardian did in spite of
knowing that the guardian was appointed with total disregard of
the law and process. Ms. Vidal did numerous times insist
that the guardian do more than what was actually ordered in
court. Knowing the Ms. Merriam was appointed with total
disregard of the law, knowing that my Mother passed two mental
exams, knowing that my Mother had submitted a sworn affidavit Ms.
Vidal dipped into her retainer to insist multiple times that
orders include things that should not be in the order such as
that the guardian should continue to monitor my Mother mental
health, give an opinion of my Mothers mental health and other
things that guardian ad litems are not authorized or allowed to
do. Ms. Vidal did dip into her retainer to do and submit an
accounting to the plaintiffs attorney in spite of the fact that
the plaintiff is not entitled to an accounting. The
accounting was submitted and shows no wrong doing. My
Mother had no funds stolen. Is that the way it works in New
Jersey while you are the Captain of the Ship? Is that ok
Vidal is currently insisting that the Trustee place my Mothers
assets where Ms. Vidal wants the trustee to place my Mothers
assets. Sound right to you? That Ms. Vidal is trying
to dictate to a Trustee where the third party my Mother keep her
assets? That Ms. Vidal wants to dictate and control my
Mother thru her Trustee? Does it appear that Ms. Vidal is
turning a blind eye while dipping into the retainer provided by
my Mother? Is this how it works in NJ? Is it ok for
Ms. Vidal to dip into the retainer and never raise the obvious
issue of standing? Is that proper representation? Or
is it fraud? Collusion? Conspiracy? The main
issue that would be raised by someone actually giving proper
representation would be that the plaintiff has no standing!
The email from Vidal at the bottom of this page is Ms. Vidal's
reply to my email. My email stated that I would not submit
a press release directing people to this page if she provided a
statute showing that the plaintiff has standing. As you can
see Ms. Vidal did not provide a statute, she replied with a
the last case management conference Judge Hogan ruled that the
guardian be dismissed, that Mr. Cuneo be dismissed, that the
guardian submit a brief report and that an accounting of my
Mothers trust accounts be provided. Ms. Vidal for some odd
reason submitted TWO
the court. One order to provide an accounting of the my
Mothers trust accounts to the plaintiffs attorney and a second
order that the guardian be dismissed and submit a report and that
Mr. Cuneo be dismissed. Judge Hogan signed one of the two
orders. The order to provide the accounting was signed, the
second order dismissing the guardian was not signed. The
guardian, Ms. Merriam, submitted a verifiably bogus report
without a signed order that made my Mother sound as if she was 99
cents short of a dollar. It took about a month and a half
for the second order to be signed by Judge Hogan. The first
order was stamped by the Surrogate as a true copy, the second
order when signed by Judge Hogan was not stamped as a true copy
by the Surrogate.
some odd reason there was yet another court order signed by Judge
Hogan on a Sunday dismissing Mr. Cuneo that was signed prior to
signing the second order that had already dismissed Mr. Cuneo.
I can only assume that Judge Hogan heard a Motion submitted by
Mr. Cuneo to be dismissed as counsel for my Mother in spite of
the fact that he was already dismissed a month and a half earlier
at the case management conference. Neither myself or my
Mother was notified of the motion hearing and can only assume it
was held so that Mr. Cuneo could put bogus information on the
record. An investigation should be able to get to the
bottom of yet another irregularity in the proceedings. It
is so obvious that the actions taken are planned in advance.
That Judge Hogan and the attorneys plan their actions in advance.
information above is just a BRIEF
of what has happened in this case. There is so much more
but I do not feel a need to tell you more at this time.
What I have told you should be enough to initiate an
investigation that you should have initiated long ago when I
first wrote to you.
case is a text book example of a kangaroo court! This
case is causing my Mothers health to deteriorate. This case
has depleted my Mothers limited assets. The attorneys have
taken my Mothers retainers to participate in the kangaroo court.
My opinion is that all have conspired with, colluded with and
knowingly and willingly participated in the gross injustice by
turning a blind eye to the facts and the law. The
plaintiff has no standing whatsoever! The plaintiff has
never had standing!
Jersey is part of the United States! The United States
where people should not have to fear rouge judges who ignore the
law, ignore the rules of court and use their position to harass,
harm and intimidate innocent people and third persons who are not
parties to the case!
you done something when I first contacted you and Paula Dow the
NJ Attorney General my Mother, the third party, would not have
suffered physically, emotionally, mentally or financially as she
has. You could have sent a message to the courts that NJ
residents have Constitutional and Civil Rights and protections!
That New Jersey is part of the United States of America and that
Americans have Constitutional and Civil Rights. That you
will no longer stand for the flagrant corruption in NJ courts!
Your claims that you want to change NJ sound more like typical
political hot air as your lack of action in this matter show no
intention to rid NJ of corruption!
reading all of the emails, correspondence, court filings and
hearing the recordings it becomes hard to think that the
attorneys have not conspired and colluded with Judge Hogan in his
kangaroo court. Are you going to do anything about Judge
Hogan, the Burlington County Surrogate and the attorneys who are
all aware of the facts and wrongdoings and willingly and knowing
participate by ignoring the flagrant violations of the law, the
flagrant violations of the rules of court and the flagrant
violations of a persons Constitutional and Civil rights?
Are you going to allow the attorneys to continue to dip into the
retainers supplied by my Mother who is not a party to the suit,
who's sworn affidavit is being ignored and who is the person
suffering physically, emotionally and financially in Judge
Hogan's kangaroo court?
have all of the documents and email correspondence. Most of
the emails can be downloaded HERE.
The emails should be enough to disgust anyone who believes in a
persons Constitutional and Civil Rights. Read the emails
and see if you feel that the attorneys are in collusion with and
conspiring with the plaintiff and Judge Hogan. All of the
documents will be provided when/if an investigation is
emails go thru a third party website that verifies sending,
delivery, records the content, shows how many times the emails
are read, for how long they are read and if and to whom they are
forwarded. Strange that some of my emails were read 50 or
more times up until I informed the parties of the tracking
it is common for the lawyers to not open my emails!
you anything? Maybe they don't want verification that
copies of my Mothers mental exams were sent to them yet again?
Maybe they don't verification that they have received copies of
sworn affidavits, or me asking yet again for a statute that gives
the plaintiff standing? Does it tell you that they know
what they are willfully participating in is wrong? That
they do not want me to have any more verification of their wrong
goings? In my emails and documents you can read just how
many times I have asked for a Statute that gives the plaintiff
never received a reply because they all know that the plaintiff
has no standing!
can read just how many times I gave all parties the opportunity
to just put an end to their criminal activity. Obviously
they have not put an end to their criminal activity as the case
continues to proceed. They
certainly do not have any fear of you
feel that they will pay no consequences for their actions.
Is that because you gave them the green light to abuse us as if
we lived in Iran?
can no longer watch my Mother, the third party, suffer due what I
perceive as criminal actions by Judge Hogan and the attorneys who
allow it to happen as they willingly and knowing participate in
what they know is wrong. Willful violations of an Americans
Civil and Constitutional Rights!
Mother lost her husband, my Father, in May of 2010. On top
of that she has had to live with the stress and anxiety of this
case since October 2010. The non stop never ending stress
caused by this case that has been ongoing for a year in spite of
the fact that the plaintiff has no standing whatsoever has caused
her great harm physically, mentally, emotionally and
financially. She can suffer no more! I get to see the
crying, vomiting, stress and anxiety this case has caused her.
She is deteriorating before my eyes! Something has to be
done to put an end to a case that should have never been heard
before it kills my Mother! My Mother should be able to live
out her life in peace!
Judicial review committee in New Jersey has already decided that
Judge Hogan did no wrong in spite of receiving most of the
information I provided above. I certainly would not trust
in or have any faith in an investigation being conducted by
anyone on the States payroll. New Jersey remains more like
an organized crime family than a State Government. Will you
demand a Federal investigation due to the fact that what has gone
on in this case is certainly a violation of Federal Title 18
U.S.C. Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights and Title 18 U.S.C.
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law? Will
you make an example of Judge Hogan and the attorneys to send a
message to the courts and attorneys that corruption will no
longer be tolerated?